tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post2140118257714567799..comments2024-01-09T15:03:54.986-05:00Comments on Wolf Howling: Fun With Liberals / ProgressivesGWhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05814327154035433443noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-57853286307005917992010-04-09T17:40:00.451-04:002010-04-09T17:40:00.451-04:00>>>>> You didn’t get mad when the g...>>>>> <i>You didn’t get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping Americans.</i><br /><br />> <i>Again, do you mean under Bush or under Obama?</i><br /><br />You BOTH mean <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echelon" rel="nofollow">under Clinton</a><br /><br />And actually, I DID. <b>I'm actually on record about it.</b> <br /><br />After 911, my objections decreased substantially, as they were based until that point on the lack of international terrorism of any significance inside America.<br /><br />>>>>>> <i>You didn’t get mad when we didn’t catch Bin Laden.</i><br /><br />> <i>So are you mad that Obama hasn't captured him yet?</i><br /><br />No one is going to "catch" him. He's wormfood under a million tons of rock, fermenting away since 2003 or 2004. It's pretty obvious that the "current" Bin Laden is a fake (which I shan't go into here). <br /><br />The Western governments go along with that fake because it makes more sense to have him fade away rather than risk him becoming a martyr for the cause.<br /><br />>>>> <i>You finally got mad when the government decided that people in America deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick.</i><br /><br />Not at all.<br /><br />First off, there's no such "right". Given that doctors didn't even exist such as it is only 200 year ago, it's kind of hard to have something that isn't a part of the innate human condition be a "right".<br /><br />Second off, if providing such service destroys the country's economy, pretty soon we might wind up being back to that situation 200 years ago where NO ONE has a doctor. Collapsed economies often do that. One of the more "successful" ones happened in a place called the Weimar Republic. No doubt you've heard of its successor.<br /><br />> <i> tell me any person you know who is sick but goes untreated for lack of access to a doctor. </i><br /><br />Hey, this man is <b>all about</b> <i>free acupuncture!!!</i> And free homeopathy! And free <i>[insert quackery here]</i> !!<br /><br />It worked for Andy Kaufman, it'll work just as well for them, too! Let's hope they all don't have to wait as long as the rest of us will for <i>real</i> medical care.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-25993637363759358602010-04-09T16:00:11.675-04:002010-04-09T16:00:11.675-04:00>>>>> You didn’t get mad when we il...>>>>> <i>You didn’t get mad when we illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us.</i><br /><br />"No threat"? That's so patently ludicrous it's not even funny. <br /><br />a) Saddam operated *3* out of the SIX known terrorist training camps in the world as of 2002. <i>I qualify that as "a threat"</i>.<br /><br />b) One of those camps was the only one of the six with a completely intact airframe solely for the purpose of training in the takeover of an airline in flight. Are we REALLY so stupid as to believe that the 9/11 hijackers did NOT arrange to make use of this? That's not proven, it's just one of those things that seems so improbable for it to NOT have been the case that it's an automatic working assumption for anyone not totally brain dead. <i>I qualify that as "a threat"</i>.<br /><br />c) Saddam rewarded the families of the 911 terrorists hundreds of thousands of dollars. Does the phrase "encouraging others to follow suit" qualify as a threat? Is egging on your friend to shout "Fire!!" in a crowded theater a threat to the safety of all therein? Does a cowboy fart around the campfire? <i>I qualify that as "a threat"</i>.<br /><br />d) Former UN weapons inspector Hans Blix -- most certainly NOT a Bush shill -- after examining the state of Saddam's facilities <b>post-invasion</b>, openly stated that <b>within 180 days of the collapse of sanctions, Saddam would be fully set up to manufacture both Botulin and Anthrax in industrial quantities</b>. Now, do you really, truly believe that, given "a" <i>and</i> "c", along with the fact that he used nerve gas on his OWN subjects, the Kurds, that Saddam would NOT have made them available for use to terrorist groups against the USA and/or Israel? Even if you claim you can't prove that he would have done so (which of course you can't), that fact still, without any doubt of any kind, absolutely CERTAINLY takes the term "No Threat" <b>off the table</b> in any <i>rational</i> discussion. Oh, wait, that was a libtard making the comment. *Never Mind*.<br /><br />e) Saddam was only in power because he made agreements as to how he was going to behave in the aftermath of the Gulf War. HE VIOLATED THOSE AGREEMENTS OVER AND OVER. There was nothing even "vaguely" <i>illegal</i> about applying the foreclosure notice on his "renege".<br /><br />f) What actual weapons he had were irrelevant. He was ACTING as though he had them. He CLAIMED he had them. He had them IN THE PAST. He USED them in the past. He REFUSED to allow inspectors in to see that he didn't have them. Every major intelligence agency BELIEVED he had them. Congress BELIEVED he had them.<br /><i><b>LOOK:</b></i> If I start yelling at my neighbors like a madman... If I shoot a gun into their house a few times without hurting anyone... If I start bellowing on a bullhorn that I'm coming over there in four hours and am going to kill every last one of them AND their little dog, too... If the cops then come by after these neighbors call them, and, in the dark, I WAVE MY HAND ABOUT WITH SOMETHING GUN-SHAPED IN IT, all the while ignoring the instructions from the cops to put up my hands and get on the ground, and THEY SHOOT ME DEAD, and it turns out I had a kielbasa in my hand, <b>it's not the friggin' COPS' fault I'm dead.</b> <br /><br />"When you're walking on eggs, <i>DON'T HOP</i>."<br /><br /><b>Saddam was doin' a friggin' <i>Flamenco</i>.</b><br /><br />QED. The invasion was justified.<br /><br />> <i>these people really are a few McNuggets short of a Happy Meal.</i><br /><br />They're missing <i>all</i> the McNuggets from a McBushel McBasket filled with McHappy McMeals. <br /><br />When they constantly re-trot out every one of these hoary BS "talking points" which have been disproven <b>over and over and over again</b> yet they Still Can't Acknowledge Them As Fact. You can't beat <b>facts</b> into these morons with anything but a sledgehammer. And I don't mean a <i>metaphorical</i> one.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.com