tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post7849788439978518874..comments2024-01-09T15:03:54.986-05:00Comments on Wolf Howling: End The All Volunteer Military?GWhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05814327154035433443noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-5178946056311667492012-05-26T01:09:04.500-04:002012-05-26T01:09:04.500-04:00>>> Let's screw the finest military i...>>> <i>Let's screw the finest military in the world in order to . . . . what, make sure we don't use it anymore?</i><br /><br />Uhhh.... YES.<br /><br />This is hardly a new idea the libtards have been floating. When they couldn't scream during the Iraq War that the military people didn't chose to be in the military, as they had in Vietnam, they went, "WAIT? WHAT? Nooooooooooo!!!" and started calling for a return to the Draft.<br /><br />Not only is this idea boneheaded, it's derivative. He's hardly the first dumbass moron libtard to argue for it.<br /><br />He must've been frustrated that all the stupid memes and tropes he and his liberal moron pals had been working so long on -- the dog, and so forth -- had already and quickly been short-circuited by the opposition and quickly turned to laughing points instead of talking points that he had to dredge up this idiotic idea in deadline desperation.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-38474940344572927042012-05-05T16:01:59.648-04:002012-05-05T16:01:59.648-04:00>>> what, make sure we don't use it a...>>> what, make sure we don't use it anymore?<br /><br />Why yes. Yes indeed.<br /><br />The idiotic notion behind this is that they could not whine with these two wars -- the people in the military all CHOSE to be there. They CHOSE to place their bodies on the line.<br /><br />If the force was conscripted, then they'd be able to argue that the "victims" IN the military had no choice, they were forced to be there.<br /><br />=========<br /><br />PG: I will either use the term "libtard", or, if I'm aiming to be non-pejorative about it, "postmodern liberal" as distinct from "classical liberal".<br /><br />There haven't been too many classical liberals born since WW*I*, mind you. I can respect classical liberals, I can't respect libtards.OBloodyHellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09992539380115488567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-70237672587919894522012-04-22T10:38:35.895-04:002012-04-22T10:38:35.895-04:00Ok. In his article, he does acknowledge Vietnam, b...Ok. In his article, he <i>does</i> acknowledge Vietnam, but his insistence that a resumption of the draft would be good for us makes me feel that he is one of those "liberals" (a true perversion of the word) that really believes that we are not qualified to make our own decisions on this (or any other) matter and that it is the duty of the government to make those decisions for us.<br /><br />Damn! Talk about a run-on sentence. :(<br />-Paul Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16530815397182777195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5492310882851199969.post-38672059473398173372012-04-22T10:15:23.946-04:002012-04-22T10:15:23.946-04:00GOOD GOD!
When I saw that title, I feared it migh...GOOD GOD!<br /><br />When I saw that title, I feared it might be <i>your</i> idea; in which case I would have to reply, <br />"While you've had some good ideas, that ain't one of them!"<br /><br /><i>"has made it all too easy for our nation to go to war — and to ignore the consequences."</i><br /><br />Has that idiot forgotten about Vietnam>? <br />-Paul Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16530815397182777195noreply@blogger.com