Johns Hopkins Prof. Fouad Ajami has a scathing critique of Obama in the WSJ, pronouncing him obsolete. Here are a few snippets:
. . . [Obama's] fall from political grace has been as swift as his rise a handful of years ago. He had been hot political property in 2006 and, of course, in 2008. But now he will campaign for his party's 2010 candidates from afar, holding fund raisers but not hitting the campaign trail in most of the contested races. Those mass rallies of Obama frenzy are surely of the past.
The vaunted Obama economic stimulus, at $862 billion, has failed. The "progressives" want to double down, and were they to have their way, would have pushed for a bigger stimulus still. But the American people are in open rebellion against an economic strategy of public debt, higher taxes and unending deficits. We're not all Keynesians, it turns out. The panic that propelled Mr. Obama to the presidency has waned. There is deep concern, to be sure. But the Obama strategy has lost the consent of the governed.
. . . There was no hesitation in the monumental changes Mr. Obama had in mind. The logic was Jacobin, the authority deriving from a perceived mandate to recast time-honored practices. It was veritably rule by emergency decrees. If public opinion displayed no enthusiasm for the overhaul of the nation's health-care system, the administration would push on. The public would adjust in due time.
The nation may be ill at ease with an immigration reform bill that would provide some 12 million illegal immigrants a path toward citizenship, but the administration would still insist on the primacy of its own judgment. It would take Arizona to court, even though the public let it be known that it understood Arizona's immigration law as an expression of that state's frustration with the federal government's abdication of its responsibility over border security. . . .
. . . The country has had its fill with a scapegoating that knows no end from a president who had vowed to break with recriminations and partisanship. The magic of 2008 can't be recreated, and good riddance to it. Slowly, the nation has recovered its poise. There is a widespread sense of unstated embarrassment that a political majority, if only for a moment, fell for the promise of an untested redeemer—a belief alien to the temperament of this so practical and sober a nation.
I share the professor's diagnosis, though I am less sure of his long-term prognosis. People are spitting blood today, but 2012 is still too far away to judge the likely public mood. I look upon this as the ultimate test of Lincoln's hypothesis, you can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.
2 comments:
> I look upon this as the ultimate test of Lincoln's hypothesis, you can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.
Not exactly, this appears to be out to answer the question:
"Can you fool enough of the people most of the time?"
A subtle but important difference. I am still amazed that his positives are as high as they are - both generally and among blacks in particular. Some things I will never understand.
Post a Comment