Showing posts with label Nasrallah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nasrallah. Show all posts

Saturday, May 10, 2008

An Obamination on Lebanon


Lebanon is on the edge of civil war, if not already there, compliments of an insurrection by Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah. Obama has issued a statement on the situation, calling for "change" to solve this act of war on a soveriegn country. But what sort of change does Obama propose? This from the statement by Obama:

Hezbollah's power grab in Beirut has once more plunged that city into violence and chaos.

Good, dead on point, Baracky, you tell ‘em.

This effort to undermine Lebanon's elected government needs to stop, and all those who have influence with Hezbollah must press them to stand down immediately.

That’s it. More. . . .more . . .

It's time to engage in diplomatic efforts to help build a new Lebanese consensus that focuses on electoral reform, an end to the current corrupt patronage system, . . .

Whoa, Baracky. Do you have a clue what you just said or to whom you just threw your support? You've just delegitimized the current democratically elected government as corrupt and unreprsentative. That line could have come from Nasrallah or the Iranian news agency - and in fact it regularly does.
__________________________________________________

Without going into the entire history of Lebanon, (Read Tom Friedman’s From Beirut to Jerusalem for an excellent recent history) Wikipedia has a very good description of the political balance as it exists in Lebanon on paper today:

Lebanon is a parliamentary, democratic republic, which implements a special system known as confessionalism. This system, allegedly meant to insure that sectarian conflict is kept at bay, attempts to fairly represent the demographic distribution of religious sects in the governing body. As such, high-ranking offices in are reserved for members of specific religious groups. The President, for example, has to be a Maronite Catholic Christian, the Speaker of the Parliament a Shi’a Muslim, the Prime Minister a Sunni Muslim and the Deputy Prime Minister an Orthodox Christian.

Read the article. That system, complimented by other agreements, is what the Lebanese worked out as a reasonable power sharing agreement. The one’s who are trying to put a fork in it are Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah. They are the ones calling it corrupt and demanding a veto for Hezbollah over all government legislation. They have refused to honor the democratic system for choosing a new President because they want someone in the post who is pro-Hezbollah and pro-Syria. This all funnels into their biggest immediate concern, shutting down investigation into the assassination of Rafik Harari and countless other anti-Syrian politicians. Indeed, that is at the heart of the recent Hezbollah’s erruption. As Righwing Nuthouse put it:

. . . the Hariri Tribunal that may start as early as next month under the auspices of the United Nations. It is a dead certainty that Hezb’allah’s role in some of the political assassinations that have rocked Lebanon over the past 3 years will be revealed. Nasrallah, and his patron in Syria Bashar Assad, will do everything in their power to prevent the tribunal from sitting. If it means taking the country to the brink of a civil war, so be it.

Read the entire post. Prior to today, the only people demanding electoral reform are Iran, Syria and its proxy, Hezbollah. Now we add Obama to that list.

Obama is incredibly dangerous. He is Jimmy Carter pumped to the breaking point with steroids. He makes Neville Chamberlin look like a warmongerer. As Gateway Pundit said:

Well, Barack Obama already has:

** The Hamas vote
** The Iranian regime's vote
** The Gaza vote
** The FARC vote
** Moammar Ghaddafi's vote
** Fidel Castro's vote
** Nicaraguan Marxist leader Daniel Ortega's vote
** Other assorted America-haters' votes, not to mention his pastor's vote
...Now it looks like Obama's shooting for (no pun intended) the Hezbollah vote!

. . . It's not surprising then that the people of Lebanon would be upset with Obama. It's also not surprising that the terror groups are throwing their support behind him.More hope and change-- For Hezbollah.

Read the entire post.


Read More...

Friday, May 9, 2008

Hezbollah Overruns Large Parts of Beirut


Lebanon is appearing ever more to be in the midst of a full scale civil war initiated by Iran's proxy militia, Hezbollah. Hezbollah has now taken control of large parts of Beirut and is attacking businesses and offices of the elected government and its members.

_____________________________________________________

Lebanese news site Ya Libnan is reporting that violence is continuing to escalate in Beirut as dawn rises on the third day of hostilities. As one observer notes, "the ongoing battles are not random, but an orchestrated plan to unfold what was called "resistance" was really aimed at controlling the power and decision-taking in Lebanon."

This from Reuters:

Hezbollah gunmen took control of large areas of Beirut on Friday in a third day of fighting between the pro-Iranian group and fighters loyal to the U.S.-backed governing coalition.

Security sources said at least 10 people had been killed and 20 wounded. The thud of exploding grenades and crackle of automatic gunfire echoed across the city in the worst internal strife since the 1975-90 civil war.

Gunmen loyal to Hezbollah forced the pro-government Future News television off the air, said a senior official at the Beirut station. Future News is owned by Saad al-Hariri, a Sunni politician and leader of the governing coalition.

The security sources said Hezbollah and fighters from the allied Amal movement -- both Shi'ite groups -- had overrun offices of Hariri's Future group across the predominantly Muslim western half of Beirut.

Gunmen had also taken over the offices of Hariri's Al-Mustaqbal newspaper, witnesses said. Smoke billowed from the building's windows.

. . . In scenes reminiscent of the darkest days of the civil war, young men armed with assault rifles roamed the streets amid smashed cars and smoldering buildings. . . .

Read the entire article.


Read More...

Thursday, May 8, 2008

In Lebanon, A Gift From Tehran


Lebanon is on the verge of civil war as Iran's proxy, Hezbollah, has sparked riots aimed at toppeling the democratically elected Lebanese government. In the photo above, the banner adorning a bridge in Beirut reads "A gift from the municipality of Tehran to the righteous, resisting Lebanese people." And indeed, where ever one looks in the Middle East and finds strife and bloodshed, the chances are far better than even that one will find "gifts" from Iran.
_______________________________________________________

Since Syria ostensibly left Lebanon following the Cedar Revolution, the government has been under constant seige. Pro-democracy and pro-government legislators who pose a threat to Syria and Iranian influence have been sytematically assassinated. For the past year, Hezbollah has shut down Iraq's government, refusing to allow it to elect a President and demanding a veto power over all acts of government. Now Iran's milita proxy, Hezbollah, is attemptig to topple the government and take complete dominance over the country. When U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, spoke a few weeks ago about Iran attempting to "Lebanize" Iraq, this is precisely of what he spoke.

Update: Elie Fawaz, a resident of Beirut writing at the Middle East Journal, sums up the overall situation:

“For years Hezbollah has tried to jump the sectarian divide by defending the causes of the umma. But when Israel withdrew from South Lebanon in 2000, Hezbollah's armada lost its raison d'etre. Yet even after the Syrian occupation ended in 2005 following the assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri, the party refused to terminate its mission and give up its arms and the many privileges enjoyed under Damascus' tutelage. To survive, Hezbollah needs its perpetual resistance, but the Party of God is today at odds with the rest of the Lebanese, and the survival of Lebanon as a state depends on the government bringing an end to this conflicted situation. There is no way one state can have two centers of decision-making, two policies, two armies, two economies, that are at odds with each others. The road to the airport must be re-opened at any cost, and Hezbollah must cease his state within a state either by negotiations or by force.”

Read the entire post. The particular match that lit the latest hostilities began two days ago, when the government sacked the chief of security at Beirut airport and started an investigation into allegations that Hezbollah "set up surveillance cameras near the Beirut airport to monitor the comings and goings of anti-Syria Lebanese politicians . . ." The government is concerned that this might be tied to future assassination attempts. The government also moved to take down a private telecommunications system being funded by Iran as a nationwide military communications network for Hezbollah tied into Syrian Intelligence:

Hizbullah has linked its private telephone networks to the Syrian Army's communications System as well as to Syria's Mobile telephone network allowing Syrian Intelligence to operate freely in Lebanon and avoid Lebanese controls, al-Mustaqbal's Faris Khashan wrote.

Internal Security Forces Commander Gen. Ashraf Rifi and Director of Military intelligence Brig. George Khoury were assigned by the government more than a month ago to discuss the issue with Hizbullah, Khashan added. However, Hizbullah's Security chief Wafiq Safa and the party's International relations official Nawaf Moussawi informed Rifi and Khoury that "anyone who touches the network would be treated the same way we treat the Zionist enemy," he wrote.

Khashan labeled Hizbullah a "militia," noting that Hizbullah is not registered with the interior ministry as a political organization operating in Lebanon. Khashan said Police Counter-terrorism expert, Maj. Wissam Eid, has been assassinated because he managed to detect the serial assassinations committed against March 14 figures to the Hizbullah telephone network.

He reported that Hizbullah sped up work on extending the network after Eid's assassination, "which means that the killing was aimed at destroying evidence on previous assassinations, including one that appears linked to Hizbullah." The crime also aimed at creating "safe communications criteria for further assassinations," he added.

Read the entire article. (H/T Rightwing Nuthouse)



More on the hostilities from the Washington Post:

Political tensions once again disrupted the Lebanese capital Wednesday, with the outbreak of armed clashes and the closure of major roads by supporters of the Hezbollah-led opposition.

Hundreds of masked teenage backers of the Shiite Hezbollah movement and its ally Amal burned tires along roads leading to Beirut's international airport, while trucks and bulldozers were used to erect barricades around the facility. At least five civilians and two soldiers were wounded in mixed areas of the capital as army and police patrols attempted to bring the violence under control, local news media reported.

The state of civil disobedience is expected to continue until the government reverses its decision this week to remove a private land-line telephone network that Hezbollah has set up across Lebanon, according to an opposition source who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

The standoff between Lebanon's Western-backed government and the Hezbollah-led opposition backed by Syria and Iran has left the country without a president since November and paralyzed the work of its parliament.

In a cabinet meeting Monday evening that lasted until early Tuesday and that participants described as a "confrontation," Prime Minister Fouad Siniora's government condemned Hezbollah's phone network as "illegal and compromising to the state's sovereignty."

The cabinet also decided to remove army Brig. Gen. Wafiq Shoukair, a Shiite, as head of security at Beirut's international airport, following reports that Hezbollah had illegally installed cameras near the airport.

"We will not negotiate, and we will not make a bargain," said Marwan Hamadeh, the telecommunications minister. "We will not withdraw any of those decisions."

Hamadeh said the phone network, which was previously limited to Beirut's southern suburbs, had recently been extended to most regions of the country, adding that the Iranian Committee to Rebuild Southern Lebanon was supervising the work.

"Not taking those decisions was not an option. They keep threatening us and intimidating us, and now we decided to stand up to them," said Ahmad Fatfat, minister of youth and sports.

Fatfat said that the cameras set up around the airport were monitoring the movement of private jets and that the government feared assassination attempts

Hezbollah denied the accusations and said it would not accept the cabinet's moves. . . .

Read the entire article. Today, the violence is increasing dramatically as Iran's proxy, Hassan Nasrallah, spiritual leader of Hezbollah, in an apparent act of projection, told his followers that the Lebanese government declared war on Hezbollah. The Lebanese on-line newspaper, Ya Libnan, has the story of Nasrallah's speech:

A war was declared against us. When the declaration ends, the disobedience ends," declared Nasrallah in a press conference on Thursday.

"The decisions (of the government) are tantamount to a declaration of war and the start of a war... on behalf of the United States and Israel." He directly said that he would go to war with the Lebanese people if he felt Hezbollah's was being forced to disarm.

"Yes, we hit the streets, protested, cut off roads and blocked the airport. This is civil disobedience as it occurs in any country." In Hassan Nasrallah's fantasy world, most countries allow outlaws to take the streets with machine guns and RPG's?

Walid Jumblatt had clearly upset the Hezbollah chief, as most of his speech was leveled at the majority leader. Nasrallah threatened to "cut off" Jumblatt's hand if he dared to touch Hezbollah's weapons.

"Whoever is going to target us will be targeted by us. Whoever is going to shoot at us will be shot by us." He repeatedly referred to the ruling coalition as "Jumblatt's government", launching a series of personal attacks on the Druze leader, calling him a liar and a killer.

In his usually eloquent fashion, Nasrallah managed to link the firing of the Hezbollah aligned airport chief as an attack on a Shiite Muslim, adding that the government plans to turn the airport into a military base for the CIA and Mossad.

"Walid Jumblatt's dream is Sunni-Shia strife. We will not fulfill his dream." "If we wanted to stage a coup, you would have woken up this morning in prison, or in the middle of the sea," a visibly arrogant Nasrallah said, responding to allegations that Wednesday's chaos was a staged coup d'etat.

Nasrallah went to great lengths to justify the illegal communications network Hezbollah has in place, saying it is used in "defending the country against Israel." . . .

Read the entire article. The speech has further stoked the violence. This also from Ya Libnan:

Fierce clashes with assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers raged in several densely populated Beirut districts immediately following Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah vowed to use weapons to defend his party's communications system.

Nasrallah delivered his message in hiding via a closed circuit press conference, where he accused "Jumblatt's government" of launching a war against Hezbollah, stressing that "this is a new era in which all red lines have collapsed."

"We are in war and they wouldn't be able to predict our reaction," Nasrallah said.

Nasrallah's hate filled press conference inspired new clashes between his followers and government supporters in Beirut districts of Msaitbeh, Ras Nabaa, Mazraa and Basta. Soon after, clashes spread to Verdun, Karakon Al-Druze, Al-Zarif, Al-Mulla and around Ain Al-Teeni.

There were also reports of Hezbollah gunmen in Hamra. . . .

Read the entire article. As one Lebanese put it, "Hezbollah is holding the country hostage." True, but the problem starts with the mad mullahs in Iran. Hezbollah and this violence is their "gift" to Lebanon.

Update: More reporting on the violence from Ya Libnan and Michael Toten.

(H/T Gateway Pundit)

Read More...

Thursday, February 21, 2008

"Uncle Mookie"

By 1942, the one mass murder responsible for more deaths then Hitler was the psychotic Joseph Stalin. Yet he was then being portrayed in our press as "Uncle Joe," a friendly ally beloved of his people. And that is not so different than the way the scorpion Moqtada al Sadr is portrayed today in a fawning peace in today's Washington Post.



_______________________________________________________

Moqtada al-Sadr presents a serious long term threat to the stabiity of Iraq. As I have blogged here and here, Sadr has close ties with Iran. He is attempting to increase his clerical rank by studying the velayat-e-faqi, Khomeini's Salafi bastardization of the Shia religion that breaks with a millenium of contrary tradition to justify and require theocratic rule in Shia countries. Sadr maintains a milia that he has refused to disarm. Sadr has used that militia to attack the central government and to enforce his rule and his views on medieval sharia law on parts of the country, including Karbala. There is a name for a country with a cleric linked to Iran who is in charge of a militia seperate and a apart from the government's forces and who takes other actions like Sadr's. It is called Lebanon.

None of the above facts come out in today's puff piece in the Washington Post. Instead we are told that

. . . American commanders who once considered [Sadr] an enemy . . . now refer to him respectfully . . .

Sadr is expected to announce by Saturday whether the freeze will be extended, his aides said. But interviews with more than a dozen leaders of the Sadrist movement suggest that whether or not it is continued, the freeze has already transformed the militia and its place in Iraqi society.

"The freeze brought many secrets to the surface," said Ahmed Abdul Hussein, 33, a Mahdi Army leader from Sadr City, a vast Shiite district of Baghdad. "Now we know who is good and who is bad. Now everyone thinks of the Mahdi Army in a new light. I think everything will be different now."

. . . In many Sadrist strongholds, the militia's focus has shifted from militancy to providing services to residents, as the Mahdi Army continues recasting itself as a political and social force.

Etc., etc. You can read the drivel here. Have no doubts that the soldiers are referring to him respectfully becasue they do not want to force him to lose face - but the respect being shown is that one would give to a scorpion. That is no more than the respect we showed the Chinese when our guns were pointed at them across from the DMZ in Korea. The reporter does not think it important to ask why the Mahdi Army continues to exist, given the peace that has descended on the Shia areas where it holds sway. Instead we get platitudes and the Mahdi party line.

There are several things I find incredibly upsetting about this piece. One, it is completely superficial, giving a pass to an enemy of the U.S. and a united Iraq, and giving a pass to an Iranian ally. Two, it is quite likely we are going to be fighting Sadr in the foreseeable future. Even our press in World War II did not give good press to Hitler in advance of our entry into the war. Lastly, this piece is ten times the press that is given to our soldiers fighting in Diyala province right now in daily combat missions. To say that our MSM has misplaced priorities and an inability to distinguish friend from foe would be a gross understatement.


Read More...