Wolf Howling: Time

Thursday, December 20, 2007

My Last Edition of Time Magazine

I've been getting this rag for I don't know how many years. And despite the fact that it is clearly a left of center magazine, I always did enjoy reading it. But while I can tolerate left wing diatribes, I've had it with Time. When, on the list of most influential and newsworthy folk, Time Magazine's editors rank General David Petraeus fifth behind not just Putin but Al Gore, than this rag is no longer worth another farthing.

Petraeus has single handidly turned a stumbling military effort and made it a success that our left not only refuses to acknowledge, but is still trying to subvert. This may be the most important event to occur in our lifetime in terms of the security of our nation. And it is a victory that comes in relation to a threat from radical Islam that our left of center folks are likewise pretending does not exist. To the extent Putin and Gore are more "newsworthy" than General Petraeus, that is only because our left wing MSM does not seem to consider success in Iraq newsworthy. What despicable sophistry.

A few months ago, in the list of 100 most influential people, our nation's President did not make the list. And in addition, Time is not renewing its contract with Charles Krauthammer. Add that to this latest outrage and, . . . well, I am just out of Time.

Getting Mugged By Reality

Joe Klein, Time's resident liberal, has penned an essay - heavilly qualified of course - that states the obvious. Iraq, whatever it may have been last year, is now successfully being pacified. And he notes that the failure of the neo-libs in Congress to acknowledge this and change tack rather then continue to try and legislate defeat at this moment is likely not going to go down well with the rest of America:

. . . The reduction of violence is real. The defeat of Al Qaeda in Iraq--sneezed at by some antiwar commentators--is nothing to sneeze at. The bottom-up efforts to reconcile Sunnis and Shi'ites across the scarred Anbar/Karbala provincial border, which I wrote about a few weeks ago, quite possibly reflect an Iraqi exhaustion with violence that has to be taken seriously as well. There is no question that the performance of the US military has improved markedly under the smarter, more flexible and creative leadership provided this year by General Petraeus. And the withdrawal of U.S. troops is beginning. The refusal of the antiwar movement--or some sections of it--to recognize these developments isn't helping its credibility.

. . . There are fewer votes now in Congress--and less cause--to cut off funding for the war than there were last Spring. A renewed campaign on the part of the hapless Democratic leadership to cut off the supplemental funds will only increase the public sense of Democratic futility. It will also play into the very real, and growing, public perception that Democrats are too busy wasting time on symbolic measures (like trying to cut off funds for the war) and shoveling pork (the water projects bill) to pass anything substantive for the public good. Too much time, and political capital, has been wasted fighting Bush legislatively on the war. I'm sure the President and the Republican Party are salivating over the prospect that Democrats will waste more time and capital over it this month...especially at a moment, however fleeting, when the situation on the ground seems to have improved in Iraq. Democrats need to think this over very, very carefully before they proceed.

Read the entrie article. Kudos to Mr. Klein for his intellectual honesty. At the other end of the spectrum, the NYT is trying so hard to ignore this reality its becoming painful. The only articles that they are running now are ones that focus like a laser on very small, negative incidents or situations. Unfortunately, ignoring the good news won't make it go away. It will only make their stock value shrink ever further.