Night of the Long Knives: Valerie Jarrett behind leak of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal
I blogged about the multiple reasons this scandal is so deeply problematic for Hillary here, but my assessments of how dangerous it all was for her future were based on an assumption that the Obama administration had her back. If that is not the case, and the administration has already initiated investigations, Hillary won't survive this.
Jonah Goldberg is having way too much fun with the e-mail scandal: It's Hillary All The Way Down
Fifty Shades of Gore: Al Gore Wants To Punish Climate Change Deniers.
One, that headline is so ridiculous. We've been coming out of the Little Ice Age for near two centuries; no one who knows the least about science claims the climate is now or ever has been static long term. Two, what Gore wants is to stop all debate. So, pointing out that, despite the theory that our temperatures will rise relative to increasing amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere, and despite the fact that ever greater quantities of CO2 have been pumped into our atmosphere over the past two decades, stating the fact that there has been no statistically significant rise in temperature in over 18 years and that maybe the theory is wrong, will result in some Gore-mandated punishment. All the while, Gore cashes in on government mandates. Disgusting.
Compare Gore to a real scientist: "[I]f our educational system does not honestly and explicitly promote the central tenet of science—that nothing is sacred—then we encourage myth and prejudice to endure."
It's going to be a huge party at Stonehenge: Solar eclipse, Supermoon, Spring equinox: Friday will see three rare celestial events
They put their pants-suits on the same as everyone else, one leg at a time: The Democratic Matriarchy
Okay, this is a new level of bizarre: Romney to box Hollyfield in Salt Lake City on May 15
Tweet
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Wolf Bytes
Posted by
GW
at
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
0
comments
Labels: Al Gore, climate change, e-mail scandal, Global Warming, Hillary Clinton
Monday, January 30, 2012
Are We About To See The Death Of The Global Warming Scam?
The article in today's Daily Mail
Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
- Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years
So what is the biggest bombshell in this article?
Is it that the MET and the University of East Anglia have confirmed that there has been no global warming for the past 15 years (contrary to NASA numbers from the despicable James Hansen?)
Is it that all of the IPCC computer models - predicated on the theory that the world will warm in direct proportion to increases in atmospheric CO2 - have failed utterly?
Is it that we seem to be heading into a lull in sunspot activity last seen during periods of intense global cooling - (in particular that period known as the little Ice Age that Michael Mann wiped from the historic records with his hockey stick graph?)
Or is it that we are about to see the heretical theory of Henrick Svensmark - that solar activity, not CO2, is the primary determinant of our globe's warming and cooling through cloud formation - finally given a real world trial? Note that the same theory passed its first test at CERN last year.
This from the Daily Mail:
The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.
The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century. Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.
Meanwhile, leading climate scientists yesterday told The Mail on Sunday that, after emitting unusually high levels of energy throughout the 20th Century, the sun is now heading towards a ‘grand minimum’ in its output, threatening cold summers, bitter winters and a shortening of the season available for growing food. Solar output goes through 11-year cycles, with high numbers of sunspots seen at their peak.
We are now at what should be the peak of what scientists call ‘Cycle 24’ – which is why last week’s solar storm resulted in sightings of the aurora borealis further south than usual. But sunspot numbers are running at less than half those seen during cycle peaks in the 20th Century.
Analysis by experts at NASA and the University of Arizona – derived from magnetic-field measurements 120,000 miles beneath the sun’s surface – suggest that Cycle 25, whose peak is due in 2022, will be a great deal weaker still.
According to a paper issued last week by the Met Office, there is a 92 per cent chance that both Cycle 25 and those taking place in the following decades will be as weak as, or weaker than, the ‘Dalton minimum’ of 1790 to 1830. In this period, named after the meteorologist John Dalton, average temperatures in parts of Europe fell by 2C. However, it is also possible that the new solar energy slump could be as deep as the ‘Maunder minimum’ (after astronomer Edward Maunder), between 1645 and 1715 in the coldest part of the ‘Little Ice Age’ when, as well as the Thames frost fairs, the canals of Holland froze solid.
Interestingly, the MET is still taking the position that there will be no global cooling because it will all be offset by increasing carbon dioxide. Cue Henrick Svensmark:
‘World temperatures may end up a lot cooler than now for 50 years or more,’ said Henrik Svensmark, director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at Denmark’s National Space Institute. ‘It will take a long battle to convince some climate scientists that the sun is important. It may well be that the sun is going to demonstrate this on its own, without the need for their help.’
He pointed out that, in claiming the effect of the solar minimum would be small, the Met Office was relying on the same computer models that are being undermined by the current pause in global-warming.
CO2 levels have continued to rise without interruption and, in 2007, the Met Office claimed that global warming was about to ‘come roaring back’. It said that between 2004 and 2014 there would be an overall increase of 0.3C. In 2009, it predicted that at least three of the years 2009 to 2014 would break the previous temperature record set in 1998.
So far there is no sign of any of this happening. But yesterday a Met Office spokesman insisted its models were still valid.
Talk about your deadenders. The MET is hanging onto their AGW CO2-centric models with the very edges of their bloody fingernails at this point. They won't be able to do it much longer.
‘We’re now well into the second decade of the pause,’ said Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. ‘If we don’t see convincing evidence of global warming by 2015, it will start to become clear whether the models are bunk. And, if they are, the implications for some scientists could be very serious.’
So is tar and feathering serious enough for these world's greatest scam artists, or is something more serious warranted? Perhaps it is for Al Gore, Michael Mann and James Hansen. What do you think, maybe permanent deportation to Siberia where they can live out their lives with a zero carbon footprint?
The real crime with all of this is that, while our governments still push global warming, the reality is that global cooling may soon be upon us - and the effects could be devastating. Unfortunately, our world will not be able to prepare for this eventuality until the AGW gravy train is brought to its final, bitter end. And given that the global warming scam is not about science, but rather about political power, patronage and money, we will be well into global cooling before that will ever happen.
Update: Linked by Paul in Houston
Posted by
GW
at
Monday, January 30, 2012
0
comments
Labels: agw, Al Gore, Cycle 25, dalton minimum, global cooling, Global Warming, Henrick Svensmark, IPCC, James Hansen, little ice age, maunder minimum, MET, Michael Mann, solar activity, solar cycle, Sun, sunspots
Friday, December 4, 2009
Climategate Update 12: The AGW Walls Start To Crumble, The Smoking Code & The Tiger Woods Index
The head of the UN's climate science body says claims that UK scientists manipulated data on global warming should be investigated. That is pretty momentous, and even if they try to whitewash it at this point, it is still going to be a giant elephant sitting in the middle of Copenhagen. That is something even the BBC acknowledged in a subsequent article. As you can see, (potentially) valid temperature station readings were taken and skewed to fabricate the results the “scientists” at the CRU wanted to believe, not what actually occurred. Do read the entire post.
While an unscrupulous American MSM maintains a blanket of silence on the greatest scientific scandal at least of our age, the science community itself is convulsing. Yesterday we were treated to Michael "Hockey Stick" Mann tossing his fellow AGW scientist, Phil "Hide the Decline" Jones under the bus on the BBC. Today, we learn that the IPCC's Chairman Mao, Rajendra Pachauri, who has completely stonewalled on Climategate up to this point, that he has now relented and called for a UN investigation. For him to do this on almost the eve of the Copenhagen Summitt means that heat must really be on. This from the BBC:
Dr Rajendra Pachauri, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said the matter could not be swept "under the carpet".
The allegations emerged after e-mails written and received by UK climate researchers appeared on the internet.
The police are investigating whether the scientists' computers were hacked.
Dr Pachauri told BBC Radio 4's The Report programme that the claims were serious and he wants them investigated. . . .
While the IPCC may have had a reality check, at least one other person is stonewalling with the help of our media. Al "green-backs" Gore, perhaps the most successful con man of all time, sits for an interview with the Politico, while the two interviewers, John Harris and Mike Allen, do not bring up a single issue surrounding Climategate. You can tell from the comments the readers of this white wash dribble were not impressed.
Over at Watts Up With That, a guest poster, Robert Greiner, a scientist and self-described AGW agnostic, pulls apart the code downloaded from the CRU and shows, line by line, how its been used to distort data. He concludes:
Where do we go from here?
It’s not as cut-and-try as one might think. First and foremost, this doesn’t necessarily prove anything about global warming as science. It just shows that all of the data that was the chief result of most of the environmental legislation created over the last decade was a farce.
This means that all of those billions of dollars we spent as a global community to combat global warming may have been for nothing.
If news station anchors and politicians were trained as engineers, they would be able to find real proof and not just speculate about the meaning of emails that only made it appear as if something illegal happened.
Conclusion
I tried to write this post in a manner that transcends politics. I really haven’t taken much of an interest in the whole global warming debate and don’t really have a strong opinion on the matter. However, being part of the Science Community (I have a degree in Physics) and having done scientific research myself makes me very worried when arrogant jerks who call themselves “scientists” work outside of ethics and ignore the truth to fit their pre-conceived notions of the world. That is not science, that is religion with math equations.
It bears remembering that the impact of climate change legislation will have little impact on global temperatures, it will vastly enrich many a rent seeker, and it will negatively impact on all of the rest of us, with, as Evangelicals point out in a recent press release, the poor being hit by far the hardest. That matters not to the far left and the rent seekers with vested interests in AGW. Just look at the ethanol/biofuel insanity. The World Bank estimates that the establishment of ethanol and bio-fuel mandates, with its negative impacts on agriculture, has driven 100 million people below the poverty line.
Lastly, John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, thinks that the American MSM, so heavilly invested in promoting the AGW meme, is now in a corner, waiting for the scandal to blow over or for some act that will allow them to report that they were "misled." Writing at PJM, he hopes for the latter but sees the former as still possible. I disagree in the long run at least. FOIA requests are about to be honored. Programs will be requested and will eventually have to be released. "Climate science" will see the light of day. Part of the reason is the internet. And until our overlords invoke the Chinese option and start controlling internet searches, the biggest search words of the day now concern Climategate. Do see EU Referendum for the Tiger Woods Index, developed by Dr. North to answer the questions "Is the public more interested in Tiger Woods than Climategate? And does the media coverage reflect the public interest?"
Prior Posts:
Climategate and Surrealism
More Climategate Fallout
Climategate Update 3
Climategate Update 4: CRU Records Worthless
Climategate Update 5: IPCC's Chairman Mao
Climategate Update 6: Climategate In Video
UNEP, Green Religion & Global Governance
Climate Update 7: IPCC's Chairman Mao Plays The Obama Card, Peer Review Analyzed, Scientific Method Explained For Paul Krugman
Climategate Update 8: The NYT Reports
Climategate Update 9: CRU Head Phil Jones Steps Down During Investigation, An MIT Prof Explains The Holes In AGW Theory, And Climate Fraud Is Everywhere
Climategate Update 10: Climategate Reverberates From The UK To Down Under
Climategate Update 11: Finally An AGW Consensus, "Hockey Stick" Mann Attacks Jones, Gore Goes To Ground
Posted by
GW
at
Friday, December 04, 2009
0
comments
Labels: Al Gore, BBC, Code, CRU, goracle, IPCC, Micahel Mann, MSM, Phil Jones, Rajendra Pachauri
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
War Profiteer Makes Ridiculous War Analogy
Al Gore, the man who has increased his net worth by 5000% in less than a decade by shilling for global warming and taking an interest in corporations set to profit wildly from the institution of global warming legislation, appeared in Oxford today and "compared the battle against climate change with the struggle against the Nazis." This is not merely a ludicrous analogy, it is incredibly offensive. Moreover, this from the same man who refuses to debate global warming and who has argued that the media should not give any airtime to scientists and others who believe global warming a dangerous hoax. This scurrilous man becomes ever more of a parody of himself as the theories used to support global warming become ever more discredited. More at Hot Air.
Posted by
GW
at
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
1 comments
Labels: Al Gore, global cooling, Global Warming, politicized science, WWII
Monday, July 6, 2009
A Really Inconvenient Truth
From Marc Morano at the Climate Depot:
The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveals yet another drop in the Earth's temperature. This latest drop in global temperatures means despite his dire warnings, the Earth has cooled .74°F since former Vice President Al Gore released "An Inconvenient Truth" in 2006.
According to the latest global satellite data courtesy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville and made into an easy to read graph by algorelied.com: "For the record, this month's Al Gore / 'An Inconvenient Truth' Index indicates that global temperatures have plunged approximately .74°F (.39°C) since Gore's film was released," noted algorelied.com. (See satellite temperature chart here with key dates noted, courtesy of http://www.algorelied.com/ - Also see: 8 Year Downtrend Continues in Global Temps) . . .
Posted by
GW
at
Monday, July 06, 2009
1 comments
Labels: Al Gore, climate change, global cooling, Global Warming, inconvenient truth
Sunday, July 5, 2009
The Goracle Needs A New Analogy
Louisiana Congressman Steve Scalise questioned the science of [global warming]. Frustrated, Mr. Gore retorted, “There are people who still believe that the moon landing was staged on a movie lot in Arizona.”
Al Gore, comparing global warming skeptics to moon landing skeptics, Al Gore Heads To The Hill To Push Climate Change Bill," Knoxville News Sentinel, 25 April 2009
Dr Aldrin said he was sceptical of climate change theories.
"I think the climate has been changing for billions of years," he said.
"If it's warming now, it may cool off later. I'm not in favour of just taking short-term isolated situations and depleting our resources to keep our climate just the way it is today.
"I'm not necessarily of the school that we are causing it all, I think the world is causing it."
Interview of Dr. Buzz Aldrin, second person to set foot on the Moon, "Buzz Aldrin calls for manned flight to Mars to overcome global problems," The Telegraph, 3 July 2009
Posted by
GW
at
Sunday, July 05, 2009
3
comments
Labels: Al Gore, Buzz Aldrin, Global Warming, goracle
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Politicized Science
. . . The public must be able to trust the science and scientific process informing public policy decisions. Political officials should not suppress or alter scientific or technological findings and conclusions. If scientific and technological information is developed and used by the Federal Government, it should ordinarily be made available to the public. To the extent permitted by law, there should be transparency in the preparation, identification, and use of scientific and technological information in policymaking. . . .
President Barack Obama, Memorandum, Subject: Scientific Integrity, 9 March 2009
****************************************************************
Obama strikes the highest of moral poses, yet scratch the surface and you will find no morality underneath. As has regularly been the case with Obama and the far left, the statists at the UN included, the gulf between words and deeds is a yawning chasm. In terms of politicized science, we have been treated over the past two months to:
- Obama's EPA making repeated claims that the science of global warming is "settled" and that regulation of CO2 is the only way to stave off disaster, yet suppressing its own internal study critical of the underlying science and that calls these conclusions into doubt. (H/T What Bubba Knows)
Update: This from CNET News:
The Environmental Protection Agency may have suppressed an internal report that was skeptical of claims about global warming, including whether carbon dioxide must be strictly regulated by the federal government, according to a series of newly disclosed e-mail messages.
Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."
The EPA official, Al McGartland, said in an e-mail message (PDF) to a staff researcher on March 17: "The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward...and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision
The e-mail correspondence raises questions about political interference in what was supposed to be an independent review process inside a federal agency--and echoes criticisms of the EPA under the Bush administration, which was accused of suppressing a pro-climate change document
Alan Carlin, the primary author of the 98-page EPA report, said in a telephone interview on Friday that his boss, McGartland, was being pressured himself. "It was his view that he either lost his job or he got me working on something else," Carlin said. "That was obviously coming from higher levels." . . .
(H/T Memorandum)
- Last week, Team Obama released a 196 page report, "Global Climate Change Impacts In The United States" that contains so many inaccuracies and false claims that, as one climate scientist has stated, it would "make Pravda blush." And indeed, one of the major scientists whose data is relied upon in the report, Roger Pielke Jr., has taken the authors to task for wholly misrepresenting his work.
- Several weeks ago, during the House Energy Committee's truncated hearings on cap and trade, Democrats trotted out Al Gore, yet shielded him from testifying alongside Lord Christopher Monckton. Gore, who has long explicitly advocated suppressing dissenting voices on global warming, regularly ducks debates on the topic. There is probably no greater measure of how politicized the science of global warming actually is than the fact that its foremost proponent is unwilling to engage in public debate on the topic.
- The UN International Panel On Climate Change, an organization notorious for its suppression of dissenting voices and for presenting twisted and sometimes outright false data, is preparing for the next round of talks in Copenhagen. A subcommittee on polar bears is meeting now to prepare their report for the conference - but absent is one of the leading polar bear experts, Dr. Mitchell Taylor. He was disinvited because he does not believe carbon dioxide is a cause of global warming. Further, his own findings are that "global warming" is not harming the polar bears, with their numbers at optimum or growing - a truly inconvenient truth that we will not hear at the Copenhagen Conference. (H/T Crusader Rabbit)
When it comes to politicization of science, Obama and the left are bathing in it. They are pushing it to promote the vast expansion of government into, as Speaker Pelosi said, "every aspect of our lives."
The problems of politicized science are obvious. One is that, if acted upon, it will result in the massive misallocation of resources. A person need look no further in that regard than the House vote on Friday to enact a massive carbon tax. The plan will have negligible impact on global temperatures yet will have a huge negative impact on our lives. If enacted, it will drive substantial resources away from productive areas of the economy while, as Doug Ross notes, providing the engine for massive social engineering. Another example has been the disastrous push into bio-fuels. That push has critically lessened world agricultural production and, last year, drove food prices rocketing upwards to a level from which they have not returned.
The second effect of politicized science is more subtle, but equally as destructive. It is that scientific theories and observations that do not fit the politicized paradigm get ignored.
One example of that concerns the growing problem of droughts. According to the global warming crowed, carbon dioxide is the culprit. This from Peter Schwerdtfeger, emeritus professor of meteorology at Flinders University, writing in the Australian:
. . . Two decades ago, I pored over the spectral properties of the infra-red radiation of [carbon dioxide], which is essential to plant life, and found that it was almost completely overshadowed by the radiative properties of water vapour, which is vital to all forms of life on earth.
Repeatedly in science we are reminded that happenings in nature can rarely be ascribed to a single phenomenon. For example, sea levels on our coasts are dependent on winds and astronomical forces as well as atmospheric pressure and, on a different time scale, the temperature profile of the ocean. Now, with complete abandon, a vociferous body of claimants is insisting that CO2 alone is the root of climatic evil. . . .
. . . I do not believe for one moment that undisciplined burning of fossil fuels is harmless, but the most awful consequence of the burning of carboniferous fuels is not the release of CO2 but the large-scale injection of minute particulate pollutants into the atmosphere.
Detailed studies led by internationally acclaimed cloud physicist Daniel Rosenfeld of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem have revealed that the minute water vapour droplets that form around some carbon particles are so small as to be almost incapable of being subsequently coalesced into larger precipitable drops. In short, the particulates prevent rainfall.
Rosenfeld's research group has shown that humans are changing the climate in a much more direct way than through the release of CO2. Rather, pollution is seriously inhibiting rain over mountains in semi-arid regions, a phenomenon with dire consequences for water resources in the Middle East and many other parts of the world, including China and Australia.
Rosenfeld is no snake-oil salesman. As an American Meteorological Society medallist, he has an internationally endorsed research record in cloud physics that no living Australian can claim to emulate. . . .
If Rosenfeld's scientific interpretations are correct, then southern Australia would greatly benefit from the application of his discoveries. At the very least, Rosenfeld's conclusions should be accorded appropriate evaluation and testing by an unprejudiced panel of peers.
Yet his work so far has been ignored in Australia because it does not fit in with the dominant paradigm that holds CO2 responsible for reduced rainfall in semi-arid regions. . . .
(H/T EU Referendum)
Yet a second example of this same evil could well prove the most disastrous of all. Those who fully embrace global warming are ignoring the signs of a cooling earth and actual cold-weather related drops in agricultural production. See here and here.
I had to laugh in March when Obama excoriated Bush for supposedly "politicizing science," particularly on the stem cell issue - an issue, as Charles Krauthammer pointed out, on which Bush had taken an ethical stand that had nothing to do with politicization. Nothing Bush did begins to compare with how Obama, the UN and the green left have politicized the science of global warming. Indeed, one would have to go back to the Catholic Church of medieval times to find anything comparable. They get away with it because a corrupt media utterly ignores their mammoth hypocrisy. Thus, as Dr. North at EU Referendum notes, the debate is rigged:
This is a broader point that deserves more attention, touching on an effect we see in defence and elsewhere. The media – as a collective – has its own narratives and as long as an utterance fits with those narratives, it is given an airing. That which goes against the grain is buried.
Currently, the media narrative on climate change is that global warming is real and represents a major threat to the planet and humankind. Similarly, all the woes in the military stem from "under-resourcing" and all problems in Afghanistan will be solved by more "boots on the ground". Thus is the debate rigged, through which means our decline into obscurity, poverty and impotence is managed.
Welcome, Doug Ross readers.
Posted by
GW
at
Sunday, June 28, 2009
4
comments
Labels: Al Gore, biofuels, blasphemy, cap and trade, carbon dioxide, drought, EPA, Global Warming, heresy, IPCC, Lord Monckton, Pelosi, Pielke, polar bears, politicization of science, pravda
Friday, May 29, 2009
Friday, May 15, 2009
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Clearly, Reeducation Is Required
Global Warming and the need for green energy have been taught as dogma in our schools for years. Young minds have been spoon fed screenings of Al Gore's An Inconveinient Truth. Daily students are told that the destruction of earth is just around the corner. And still it is not enough - at least for students at Selkirk High School in Scotland. When surveyors asked the students what they thought the best use of a patch of local land might be - with the approved answer being to use it for a wind farm - what the surveyors got instead were votes for a brothel or a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet. Heh. Well, in the interests of keeping this a PG blog, I will refrain from ribald commentary on the various similarities between those seemingly disparate choices. Regardless, and to make matters worse, the wind farm was explicitly voted down by the students. To the surveyors, this was problematic indeed. Said Dr. Neil, this "demonstrates there must be more done to get the message across." Let the reeducation commence.
(H/T EU Referendum)
Posted by
GW
at
Sunday, May 10, 2009
1 comments
Labels: Al Gore, an inconveinient truth, anthropogenic global warming, Global Warming, KFC, propaganda, reeducation
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Our Drive To Green Nirvana
I am of course not talking the particular shade of green that graces our currency. That green you can kiss goodbye as cap and trade takes effect at an estimated cost of near $4,000 per U.S. family. As Democratic Rep. John Dingell mentions in the video below, this will be a massive hidden tax on the U.S. public.
That said, this portends to be a gargantuan cash cow for people with business interests in companies ready to capitalize on cap and trade. Al Gore, of course, is one such person. While capitalism creates wealth, socialism removes wealth from the majority of society - that is, of course, but for the socialist overlords and their friends.
As I mention in posts below, the claim of global warming that cap and trade is supposed to address has actually already been addressed by the penultimate decision maker - the sun. We are in a period of global cooling and the sun has gone into an inactive phase that may well signal a long phase of global cooling. The computer models the IPCC and Al Gore have relied upon to support the global warming canard are becoming ever more divorced from reality.
Indeed, globabl warming skeptics were ready to pounce on Al Gore when he appeared at a hearing before the odious Henry Waxman's energy committee yesterday. The hearing concerned the cap and trade bill. Given that vigirous debate is at the heart of a working democracy, the radical lefties on the committee refused Republicans the right to have their alternative, Lord Monkton, testify along with Gore. The left are hellbent on achieving their goals and will allow no dissenting voice get in their way.
I truly doubt that we will recognize America by 2012.
Posted by
GW
at
Saturday, April 25, 2009
2
comments
Labels: Al Gore, cap and trade, carbon dioxide, Dingell, Lord Monkton, Waxman
Monday, August 18, 2008
Environmentalists & Dems Opposed To Alternative Energy
In this year's great energy debate, Democrats describe a future when the U.S. finally embraces the anything-but-carbon avant-garde. It turns out, however, that when wind and solar power do start to come on line, they face a familiar obstacle: environmentalists and many Democrats. Read the entire article. If we are going to stand any chance of addressing our energy needs before our economy gets truly hurt over the next one to two decades, the first thing that has to happen is a massive overhaul of the legal and regulatory framework that I blogged about here. The overhaul does not mean that we need to stop common sense protection of the environment, but it does mean that we need to take the ultimate decisions out of the hands of a judiciary and streamline the process for dispute resolution. Of course, we are experiencing exactly the same dynamic over here, as the greenies get their knickers in a twist over the conflict between saving the little tweetie birds and indulging in their wet dreams of a carbon-free future.
If you listen to Obama's ad running during the Olympics, the only reason we do not live in alternative energy utopia today is because we have held back building it. Merely elect the One and he will "fast track" alternative energy to solve our needs and create millions of new jobs. It is the modern equivalent of promising to feed the masses with a few fish and loaves.
And the Goracle is pushing the same snake oil in television ads. His latest organization, WeCanSolveIt.org, is running its an ad pushing for a compete change to a carbon free U.S. in ten years. According to his site, with $4 gas prices, we can not longer afford to wait to get rid of gas and oil.
Alternative energy is far from ready for prime time. None of it is close to being cost effective nor is any of it proven to scale. Wind power and solar power combine to provide less than 1% of our energy today and both suffer significant drawbacks in their current form. That does not mean we do not want to toss a great deal of R&D money at it. But it does mean that anyone today who promises to replace oil, coal and gas with solar, power and bio-fuels is either insane or has an ulterior motive. And don't tell me that subsidizing the alternative energy is the key. That is simply hiding the true cost of energy by paying for the bulk of it through taxes. Further a massive change in infrastructure is going to take years - much of it because of opposition from Democrats and environmentalists.
But in at least one comparison, oil and gas exploitation stand on precisely the same footing as alternative energy. That is that both are exposed to the same insane environmental laws that hand the keys to the court house to every radical environmental group in and out of the U.S. And, as the WSJ points out today, when one goes from the utopian rhetoric to the real world practicalities, Democrats and the environmental lobby are as opposed to exploiting alternatives as they are to exploiting oil and gas:
This from the editors at the WSJ:
To wit, the greens are blocking the very transmission network needed for renewable electricity to move throughout the economy. The best sites for wind and solar energy happen to be in the sticks -- in the desert Southwest where sunlight is most intense for longest, or the plains where the wind blows most often. To exploit this energy, utilities need to build transmission lines to connect their electricity to the places where consumers actually live. In addition to other technical problems, the transmission gap is a big reason wind only provides two-thirds of 1% of electricity generated in the U.S., and solar one-tenth of 1%.
Only last week, Duke Energy and American Electric Power announced a $1 billion joint venture to build a mere 240 miles of transmission line in Indiana necessary to accommodate new wind farms. Yet the utilities don't expect to be able to complete the lines for six long years -- until 2014, at the earliest, because of the time necessary to obtain regulatory approval and rights-of-way, plus the obligatory lawsuits.
In California, hundreds turned out at the end of July to protest a connection between the solar and geothermal fields of the Imperial Valley to Los Angeles and Orange County. The environmental class is likewise lobbying state commissioners to kill a 150-mile link between San Diego and solar panels because it would entail a 20-mile jaunt through Anza-Borrego state park. "It's kind of schizophrenic behavior," Arnold Schwarzenegger said recently. "They say that we want renewable energy, but we don't want you to put it anywhere."
California has a law mandating that utilities generate 20% of their electricity from "clean-tech" by 2010. Some 24 states have adopted a "renewable portfolio standard," while Barack Obama wants to impose a national renewable mandate. But the states, with the exception of Texas, didn't make transmission lines easier to build, though it won't prevent them from penalizing the power companies that fail to meet an impossible goal.
Texas is now the wind capital of America (though wind still generates only 3% of state electricity) because it streamlined the regulatory and legal snarls that block transmission in other states. By contrast, though Pennsylvania's Democratic Governor Ed Rendell adopted wind power as a main political plank, he and Senator Bob Casey are leading a charge to repeal a 2005 law that makes transmission lines slightly easier to build.
Wind power has also become contentious in oh-so-green Oregon, once people realized that transmission lines would cut through forests. Transmissions lines from a wind project on the Nevada-Idaho border are clogged because of possible effects on the greater sage grouse. Similar melodramas are playing out in Arizona, the Dakotas, the Carolinas, Tennessee, West Virginia, northern Maine, upstate New York, and elsewhere.
In other words, the liberal push for alternatives has the look of a huge bait-and-switch. Washington responds to the climate change panic with multibillion-dollar taxpayer subsidies for supposedly clean tech. But then when those incentives start to have an effect in the real world, the same greens who favor the subsidies say build the turbines or towers somewhere else. The only energy sources they seem to like are the ones we don't have.
Update: EU Referendum notes a similar situation on their side of the pond:
But then, since the real greenie agenda is to force us back into the Stone Age – as long as we don't light any fires with our flints – this sort of confusion is grist to the mill. There is nothing quite so carbon-free as no power at all – the inevitable consequence of this greenie schizophrenia.
Posted by
GW
at
Monday, August 18, 2008
0
comments
Labels: Al Gore, alternative energy, Barack Obama, Democrats, energy, environmental lobby, gas, goracle, obama, oil, oil shale, regulation, solar, utopia, wind
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Her Majesty's Navy & Anthropogenic Global Warming
Scientists have uncovered a treasure trove of meteorological information contained in the detailed logs kept by those on board the vessels that established Britain's great seafaring traditition including those on Nelsons' Victory and Cook's Endeavour. Read the entire article. As to Mr. Wheeler's assertion, I am quite sure that the results of this study will be studiously ignored by all of those who have financial and political stakes in the canard of anthropogenic global warming - which includes everyone from Nancy Pelosi and Obama to Gore and the IPCC.
The Telegraph is reporting on a study done of thousands of log books from Royal Navy ships in the 17th and 18th century. Their finding - the weather patterns we are seeing today were replicated then, thus strongly suggesting that that our global warming - or cooling as is occurring for the past decade - is not anthropogenic and tied to carbon dioxide emissions.
______________________________________________________
This from the Telegraph:
Every Royal Naval ship kept a detailed record of climate including air pressure, wind strength, air and sea temperature and major meteorological disturbances.
A group of academics and Met Office scientists has unearthed the records dating from the 1600s and examined more than 6,000 logs, which have provided one of the world's best sources for long-term weather data.
Their studies have raised questions about modern climate change theories. A paper by Dennis Wheeler, a geographer based at Sunderland University, recounts an increasing number of summer storms over Britain in the late 17th century.
Many scientists believe that storms are caused by global warming, but these were came during the so-called Little Ice Age that affected Europe from about 1600 to 1850.
The records also suggest that Europe saw a spell of rapid warming, similar to that experienced today, during the 1730s that must have been caused naturally.
"British archives contain more than 100,000 Royal Navy logbooks from around 1670 to 1850 alone," Mr Wheeler said. "They are a stunning resource. Global warming is a reality, but our data shows climate science is complex. It is wrong to take particular events and link them to carbon dioxide emissions.
"These records will give us a much clearer picture of what is really happening."
And No Oil For Pacifists has the latest round-up of news contradicting assertions that sea levels are rising and showing the inaccuracy of climate change modeling.
H/T Brits At Their Best
Art: On Board HMS Bellerophon, Sir William Quiller Orchardson, 1880
Posted by
GW
at
Thursday, August 07, 2008
0
comments
Labels: Al Gore, anthropogenic global warming, Britain, carbon dioxide, climate change, goracle, Royal Navy, UK
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Interesting Posts From Around The Web - 19 June 2008
AP is making a rather sinister effort to squeeze the blogosphere and limit criticism of its articles and photos, first by Take Down Notices and now by claiming rights to remuneration for quotes or pictures. The Whited Sepulchre does a good job of laying out the facts. AP is ignoring the federal fair use statute (US Copyright Act, Chapter 1, § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use). Tom Blumer at Bizzy Blog has a good piece on this with links and an open letter he has drafted articulating his own well founded objections. Activist Courts I wrote in Judicial Activism Run Amock that the Supreme Court decision in Boumediene was clearly a policy decision, not a reasoned legal opinion, and that Justice Kennedy’s treatment of the controlling authority was so disingenuous it would not have received a passing grade applying standards appropriate for a first year law school student. Debbie at Right Truth weighs in, asking if we can impeach Supreme Court Justices? Consul at Arms says it most succinctly – less habeas, more corpses. Wars Against Western Culture and Civilization The secular marxist left are waging a war against religion and they are doing so enlisting the police powers of the state. I wrote here about how it is occurring in occurring in Britain and how it is severely impacting society. Per Redstate, we also see the same precise things playing out on this side of the pond. Goracle The hypocrisy of the Goracle is of such proportions that Eugene at A Western Heart can see it across continents. Obama Obama is no less hypocritical than the Goracle, though in his case, as Q&O points out, its to be found in his sudden reappraisal of NAFTA. The Conservative Cat has his fur up over Obama’s embrace of the Goracle’s plan for solving our energy crisis. As this unusually intelligent and articulate tabby observes, while Obama stands against drilling because it won’t immediately solve our problems and may take several years, his proposals are "still in the laboratory" and may well never solve our problems. Economics - & Our Left Reveal Their Inner Marx Very ominously, Brain Droppings notes that the Royal Bank of Scotland has issued a global stock and credit crash alert. Republicans and Democrats The more I hear of Jim DeMint, the more I would like to see him at the top of the Republican Party leadership. He is now leading the charge to stop the Countrywide bailout until the below market loans given to multiple Democrats, including the odious Chris Dodd, can be investigated. Vast Rightwing Conspiracy has the story. Iraq and Afghanistan Wars From MK down under, during the past week, Iraq experienced the lowest number of security incidents since March 2004. And back at home, Blonde Sagacity notes that charges against the Marines over Haditha continue to crumble. Hillbilly White Trash posts on the plans of the Haditha Marines to sue Jack Murtha for defamation, noting "Murtha [smeared the Haditha Marines] not because he actually believed in the Marine's guilt but because he saw some short term political advantage in it." Radical Islam in Britain and Europe Barking Moonbat EWS blogs on Britain’s release of bin Laden’s right hand man from prison on bail because the British courts are interpreting controlling EU law to mean that they cannot boot him out of the country. He will now live on benefits and the EU taxpayers will be paying well over the equivalent of a million dollars a year keeping him under protection and surveillance. So what is this man’s first public statement upon his release: "Terrorise the non-believers." The BBC and Its Anti-Western Bias Throughout Europe, there are free speech limitations on what a blogger can write – and several, including Lionheart in Britain, have been arrested under "hate speech" laws. But one would never know that from the BBC. Shield of Achilles points out that in their article discussing countries where bloggers are under fire for the pixeled word, the BBC identifies Iran, Pakistan, China and . . . the U.S. There is no more of an anti-American organization than the BBC. A further clue as to their attitude towards objectivity can be gleaned from one BBC’s reporter’s admission that the BBC prominently displayed a picture of Bush as Hitler in their newsroom. Israel, the US and the IAEA Elder of Ziyon posts on an article discussing the long history of U.S. support for a Jewish homeland. The canard that U.S. support is based on the strength of the "Jewish" lobby is, I think, far more the propaganda of the Wahhabi lobby. Britain and the EU An Englishman’s Castle notes that Scotland has passed a questionable law further limiting freedom of speech and now wants to impose its laws across national borders. History: The Irish Elk posts with good links on Bunker Hill Day. The BBC and Its Anti-Western Bias Throughout Europe, there are free speech limitations on what a blogger can write – and several, including Lionheart in Britain, have been arrested under "hate speech" laws. But one would never know that from the BBC. Shield of Achilles points out that in their article discussing countries where bloggers are under fire for the pixeled word, the BBC identifies Iran, Pakistan, China and . . . the U.S. There is no more of an anti-American organization than the BBC. A further clue as to their attitude towards objectivity can be gleaned from one BBC’s reporter’s admission that the BBC prominently displayed a picture of Bush as Hitler in their newsroom. Science & Technology Power and Control has a fascinating report on fusion research – which I suspect will be the next giant evolutionary step in our energy paradigm. Heh From TNOY, Google’s new logos to commemorate holiday’s in response to questions about their political leanings. For example, here is Flag Day [Update: Yes, that is the flag being burned - tough to see on my site, apparently]: Finish With The Feel Good Stuff And thank God not all the news is bad. Sometimes, it’s a love story and, where such is found, it make an appropriate high note to end on. Happy 31st Anniversary to Seraphic Secret and his wife.
Some of the most interesting posts from around the web, all below the fold.
Art: Pierrot in Criminal Court, Thomas Couture, 1870
AP’s War On Bloggers
Red Alerts notes an utterly despicable British judge who similarly needs to be cashiered.
Not to be left out from the tyranny of judicial insanity and overreach, the Covenant Zone that our suffering Canadian friends need to impeach a few of their own judges. Indeed, Rebellion has words of wisdom for his children in light of the inexplicable Canadian decision. Well, it is explicable really. Just understand that anyone with a leftist bent feels perfectly capable of ordering all aspects of your life better than you can and will hapilly do so if placed in any position giving them the power to do it.
From the Jawa Report, a federal court judge has now made it illegal to fire illegal aliens in California.
And on a related note, The Truth is not too happy with lawyers, either.
Sunlit Uplands has the story of China persecuting its Christians. While in Sydney, Midnight Sun documents our intelligentsia celebrating the trashing of Christianity under the guise of art, noting both the hypocritical double standard being applied to Islam and wondering whether it is time Christians stopped ignoring the attacks.
Postmodern Conservative, guest blogging at Liberty Corner, has a fascinating post on several cultural topics of interest, including slavery and the culture clash between America and Europe.
The Colossus of Rhodey points out that Obama is image conscious, refusing to allow two Muslim women wearing scarves to be seated behind him and thus visible to cameras. And, as Soccer Dad points out, let’s not forget his selective outrage and studied silence.
Rand Simberg at Transterrestrial Musings notes that Obama is "no Jimmy Carter" because Obama does not possess Carter’s ethics. True, perhaps, but as This Ain’t Hell notes, Obama does embrace many of Carter’s failed policies. Joshua Pundit points out that Obama’s "new" foreign policy team are all Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton retreads.
Discriminations has an excellent post looking at the intersection of identity politics, "post racial" politics, and racial quotas, all in light of the Obama nomination. And as Gay Patriot notes, Obama will "say or do anything to get elected."
No Oil For Pacifists gives an excellent discussion of why Obama’s embrace of a "9-10" policy to combat terrorism seems dangerously naïve. On the same topic, Bulldog Pundit is wondering how long it will be until Obama embraces neighborhood watches as the centerpiece of his plans to fight Islamic radicalism.
Sake White notes that the war crimes trials Obama plans will first be aimed at the prior administration. And Van Helsing at Right Wing News points out, that call has recently been seconded by Massachusetts School of Law who are convening a conference to discuss strategy for war crimes trials of the Bush administration with an eye towards hanging.
From Ironic Surrealism, AP is scrubbing their pages of references to Obama and his ‘alleged Kenyan cousin,’ Odinga on the heels of Raila Odinga’s Washington visit.
Stop the ACLU points out that our left has finally revealed their inner Marx with calls to nationalize our oil industry. As Dave at Four Right Wing Whackos notes, "Yes, they truly are the American Communist Party. Is there any other vital part of our economy that you would like to nationalize and destroy, Comrade Commissar?" As Vocal Minority points out, Democrats are following the tried and true method of repeating a lie often enough - in this case "drilling won’t work to solve the oil problem" - that people will start to believe it. Somehow, I don't think that will work this time.
From an excellent post at Under the Hill comes this new Democrat button [update: via Dutch Concerns]:
That happens to be right along the lines of Cheat Seeking Missle’s home of the future (after 4 years of an Obama administration).
And do see this short but utterly superb description of socialist reality from The Deleware Curmudgeon.
Blogs of War has Senator John Cornyn’s video introduction to be played at the Texas GOP State Convention – and it has a few on the left going into "faux meltdown."
Betsy’s Page notes the death of Bench Mark rage. "[N]ow that they have almost all been met, the Democrats somehow neglect to mention what before they had sworn were the crucial sign to see if the surge had succeeded."
Subadei ponders the conundrum posed by the Taliban’s safe havens in Pakistan and what that means for NATO, the U.S., Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Glittering Eye provides an update on Afghanistan.
Political Insecurity is still having difficulty believing that he found praise for George Bush’s conduct of the war on terror in the opinion section of the Guardian – a British paper known on occasion to make the NYT editorial board appear as neocons.
Don’t miss the continuing series, Wednesday’s Heroes, at A Rose By Any Other Name.
The above should be taken within the context of the much larger problem that all of Europe has with the spread of Muslims within their borders and the fact that they are pursuing domination rather than integration. See Sheik Yer’mami’s excellent post.
Indeed, per the Dhivehistan Report, it seems that Muslims in Europe are quite willing to intimidate and attack anyone who takes issue with their claim to be a religion of peace.
From Jammie Wearing Fools, it would seem someone in Palestine has a colorful opinion of our Sec. of State: 'Condoleezza Rice Is a Black Scorpion with A Cobra's Head Who Has the Blood of Palestinian Children Between Her Lips and On Her Fangs'
Its par for the course for the anti-western multiculturalists at the BBC. The BBC regularly produce as entertainment dramas that portray Christians, Americans, etc. as terrorists while Muslisms are portrayed as peaceful. Fulham Reactionary has the story on that one.
Meryl Yourish and Le Monde think that the IAEA’s head, Mohammed el-Baridei is in "the mullah’s pocket."
Acorns of Truth has an interesting tribute to the Irish in light of their rejection of the EU Constitution / Treaty of Lisbon. But, as EU Referendum notes, neither Britain’s Labour government nor the EU intend to let democracy stand in the way of their coup. As Hibernia Girl asks, in the wake of EU shennanigans to get around the Irish vote, "What part of NO do you suppose these eejits don't understand?"
Dave in Boca ponders what will happen when the pendulum swings – as it surely will – when Europe’s citizens decide they have had enough of the anti-democratic EU. I for one have never understood how this coup – for that is precisely what the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty is when taken with no referendum of the governed – could occur without blood in the streets.
Cardinal Wolsey’s is hosting the Military History Carnival. The posts are fascinating.
At Got Medieval, an interesting look at how emoticons have their roots in medieval manuscripts.
Spinning Cleo has a tongue in cheek post on the return of medieval mass transit.
Its par for the course for the anti-western multiculturalists at the BBC. The BBC regularly produce as entertainment dramas that portray Christians, Americans, etc. as terrorists while Muslisms are portrayed as peaceful. Fulham Reactionary has the story on that one.
KG at Crusader Rabbit posts puzzles for rocket scientists. See if you can figure it out. It overloaded my rather limited intelligence rather quickly.
And from Scott Ott, "As a goodwill gesture in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to grant writs of habeas corpus to detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, al Qaeda today announced it would grant its beheadees what it called "writs of habeas corpse."
From Rhymes With Right, all is explained now about the MSNBC anti-American bent. Keith Olberman and Afghani war lord Gulbeddin Hekmatyar really do appear to have been separated at birth.
Callimachus goes retro with some old Iron Curtain humor.
Posted by
GW
at
Thursday, June 19, 2008
7
comments
Labels: Afghanistan, Al Gore, Ap, art, BBC, economics, EU, fusion, history, humor, Iraq, Israel, judicial activism, marxism, obama, Radical Islam, socialism, terrorism, UK
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Harbingers of the Apocalypse
As if they didn’t already have enough problems on their hands fat people are now being blamed for global warming. Read the entire article. I wonder how the Goracle is going to take this as he looks as if he has been filling out a lot lately. And let's not even get to Michael Moore and Rob Reiner. If this theory has any validity, than those two alone are likely responsible for the melting of the polar ice sheet. Hymn to the belly From: Pleasure Reconciled to Virtue,
Look if you dare upon the new four horsewomen of the apocalypse who have been loosed upon the land. They are no mere mortals. Gluttony wears a black bikini and has the power to make us overeat at every turn. Sloth wears the green bikini, and causes us to remain motionless on couches while the mere thought of exercise is pondered only fleetingly and with abhorence. In the red bikini is Heavy Foods, whose wonderous cakes, delectible chocolates and candies overloaded with calories call ever bewitchingly to our ears. And last comes "Does My Ass Look Fat In This." She is the great deceiver who makes us lie to others and ourselves. Her siren song allows us to keep thinking that we can wait til the morrow to begin our diets and her discordant notes cause us to believe the claims of snake oil salesman who offer, for a heavy price, the latest placebo that they tell us will allow us to lose weight even as we settle in to eat the entire breakfast bar at Shoneys. Together they form the four horsewomen of the apolcalypse and their coming together is a harbinger of the end of days due to . . . . global warming? Er, yes, at least according to scientists in Britain who now count obesity as one of the primary causes of global warming.
________________________________________________________
This from the Telegraph:
Mr Edwards and his colleague Ian Roberts argue that because thinner people eat less and are more likely to walk than rely on cars, a slimmer population would lower demand for fuel and food.
Because 20 percent of greenhouse gas stems from agriculture any reduction in food consumption would help cut emissions.
Edwards and Roberts found that obese people need 1,680 daily calories to sustain normal energy and another 1,280 calories to maintain daily activities, 18 percent more than someone with a healthy body mass index.
At least 400 million adults worldwide are obese. The World Health Organization (WHO) projects by 2015, 2.3 billion adults will be overweight and more than 700 million will be obese.
In their model, the researchers estimate 40 percent of the global population is obese, with a body mass index of 30 or over.
The normal range is usually considered to be 18 to 25, with more than 25 considered overweight and above 30 obese.
"Promotion of a normal distribution of BMI would reduce the global demand for, and thus the price of, food," Edwards and Roberts wrote in the latest edition of The Lancet. . . .
At any rate, this turn of events marks a major departure from Britain's historically appreciative view of increasing waistlines. One imagines that the works of the great Ben Johnson's will soon fall out of favor. In anticipation of that tragedy, let's look at least one last time at Johnson's famous ode to obesity, composed near four centuries ago:
Oom! room! make room for the bouncing Belly,
First father of sauce and deviser of jelly;
Prime master of arts and the giver of wit,
That found out the excellent engine, the spit,
The plough and the flail, the mill and the hopper,
The hutch and the boulter, the furnace and copper,
The oven, the bavin, the mawkin, the peel,
The hearth and the range, the dog and the wheel.
He, he first invented the hogshead and tun,
The gimlet and vice too, and taught 'em to run;
And since, with the funnel and hippocras bag,
He's made of himself that now he cries swag;
Which shows, though the pleasure be but of four inches,
Yet he is a weasel, the gullet that pinches
Of any delight, and not spares from his back
Whatever to make of the belly a sack.
Hail, hail, plump paunch! O the founder of taste,
For fresh meats or powdered, or pickle or paste!
Devourer of broiled, baked, roasted or sod!
And emptier of cups, be they even or odd!
All which have now made thee so wide i' the waist,
As scarce with no pudding thou art to be laced;
But eating and drinking until thou dost nod,
Thou break'st all thy girdles . . .
. . . . . and break'st forth a god.
Ben Johnson, 1618.
Posted by
GW
at
Saturday, May 17, 2008
6
comments
Labels: Al Gore, ben johnson, Global Warming, goracle, morbid obesity, obesity, ode to the belly
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change
The IPCC is pre-programmed to produce reports to support the hypotheses of anthropogenic warming and the control of greenhouse gases, as envisioned in the Global Climate Treaty. The 1990 IPCC Summary completely ignored satellite data, since they showed no warming. The 1995 IPCC report was notorious for the significant alterations made to the text after it was approved by the scientists – in order to convey the impression of a human influence. The 2001 IPCC report claimed the twentieth century showed ‘unusual warming’ based on the now-discredited hockey-stick graph. The latest IPCC report, published in 2007, completely devaluates the climate contributions from changes in solar activity, which are likely to dominate any human influence. The document sumarizes its findings in Section 1: The IPCC continues to undervalue the overwhelming evidence that, on decadal and century-long time scales, the Sun and associated atmospheric cloud effects are responsible for much of past climate change. It is therefore highly likely that the Sun is also a major cause of twentieth century warming, with anthropogenic GH gases making only a minor contribution. In addition, the IPCC ignores, or addresses imperfectly, other science issues that call for discussion and explanation. Do see the entire report. And keep your hands firmly on your wallets until you decide whether we really need to engage in economy busting measures - such as biofuels and carbon credits - on the basis of the assertions of the Goracle.The 2008 Non-Governmental International Conference on Climate Change has been meeting in New York since March 2. This meeting was convened by those scientists who are not part of the Goracle's "consensus" about global warming.
______________________________________________________
A summary of the opinions and arguments being aired at the NG-IPCC can be found in the publication Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climage. The document begins with a rebuttal of the work of the highly politicized UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) penned by Frederick Seitz, President Emeritus, Rockefeller University, past President of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society, and Chairman of the Science and Environmental Policy Project:
The present report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) focuses on two major issues – the very weak evidence that the causes of the current warming are anthropogenic (Section 2) and the far more robust evidence that the causes of the current warming are natural (Section 3) – and then addresses a series of less crucial topics:
- Computer models are unreliable guides to future climate conditions (Section 4);
- Sea-level rise is not significantly affected by rise in GH gases (Section 5);
- The data on ocean heat content have been misused to suggest anthropogenic warming. The role of GH gases in the reported rise in ocean temperature is largely unknown (Section 6);
- Understanding of the atmospheric carbon dioxide budget is incomplete (Section 7);
- Higher concentrations of GH gases are more likely to be beneficial to plant and animal life and to human health than lower concentrations (Section 8); and
- Conclusion: Our imperfect understanding of the causes and consequences of climate change means the science is far from settled. This, in turn, means proposed efforts to mitigate climate change by reducing GH gas emissions are premature and misguided. Any attempt to influence global temperatures by reducing such emissions would be both futile and expensive (Section 9).
Posted by
GW
at
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
0
comments
Labels: Al Gore, dalton minimum, EU, Global Warming, goracle, hockey stick, IPCC, maunder minimum, solar activity, UN