Wednesday, September 10, 2008

From PUMA to Palinocrat

Tammy Bruce, lifelong Democrat, Hillary supporter, and former head of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW, the National Organization For Women, has crafted a fascinating essay discussing the ramifications of the Palin nomination. The combination of misogynistic attacks on Hillary during the Democratic primaries and the far left's reaction to McCain's pick of Gov. Palin as a running mate have laid bare the canard that the far left sought equality for women - or as I argue here, any minority. That reality has dawned on Ms. Bruce. In response, she eloquently explains how this completely changes the dynamics of the social war that the U.S. has been engaged in for the past half century and she explains why she will now support the McCain Palin ticket:

This from Tammy Bruce republished at RCP:

In the shadow of the blatant and truly stunning sexism launched against the Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign, and as a pro-choice feminist, I wasn't the only one thrilled to hear Republican John McCain announce Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. . . . For Democrats, she offers . . . a chance to vote for a someone who is her own woman, and who represents a party that, while we don't agree on all the issues, at least respects women enough to take them seriously.

. . . Clinton voters, in particular, have received a political wake-up call they never expected. Having watched their candidate and their principles betrayed by the very people who are supposed to be the flame-holders for equal rights and fairness, they now look across the aisle and see a woman who represents everything the feminist movement claimed it stood for. Women can have a family and a career. We can be whatever we choose, on our own terms. For some, that might mean shooting a moose. For others, perhaps it's about shooting a movie or shooting for a career as a teacher. However diverse our passions, we will vote for a system that allows us to make the choices that best suit us. It's that simple.

The rank bullying of the Clinton candidacy during the primary season has the distinction of simply being the first revelation of how misogynistic the party has become. The media led the assault, then the Obama campaign continued it. . . .

Virtually moments after the GOP announcement of Palin for vice president, pundits on both sides of the aisle began to wonder if Clinton supporters - pro-choice women and gays to be specific - would be attracted to the McCain-Palin ticket. The answer is, of course. There is a point where all of our issues, including abortion rights, are made safer not only if the people we vote for agree with us - but when those people and our society embrace a respect for women and promote policies that increase our personal wealth, power and political influence.

Make no mistake - the Democratic Party and its nominee have created the powerhouse that is Sarah Palin, and the party's increased attacks on her (and even on her daughter) reflect that panic.

The party has moved from taking the female vote for granted to outright contempt for women. That's why Palin represents the most serious conservative threat ever to the modern liberal claim on issues of cultural and social superiority. Why? Because men and women who never before would have considered voting for a Republican have either decided, or are seriously considering, doing so.

They are deciding women's rights must be more than a slogan and actually belong to every woman, not just the sort approved of by left-wing special interest groups.

Palin's candidacy brings both figurative and literal feminist change. The simple act of thinking outside the liberal box, which has insisted for generations that only liberals and Democrats can be trusted on issues of import to women, is the political equivalent of a nuclear explosion.

The idea of feminists willing to look to the right changes not only electoral politics, but will put more women in power at lightning speed as we move from being taken for granted to being pursued, nominated and appointed and ultimately, sworn in.

It should be no surprise that the Democratic response to the McCain-Palin ticket was to immediately attack by playing the liberal trump card that keeps Democrats in line - the abortion card - where the party daily tells restless feminists the other side is going to police their wombs.

The power of that accusation is interesting, coming from the Democrats - a group that just told the world that if you have ovaries, then you don't count.

Yes, both McCain and Palin identify as anti-abortion, but neither has led a political life with that belief, or their other religious principles, as their signature issue. Politicians act on their passions - the passion of McCain and Palin is reform. In her time in office, Palin's focus has not been to kick the gays and make abortion illegal; it has been to kick the corrupt and make wasteful spending illegal. The Republicans are now making direct appeals to Clinton supporters, knowingly crafting a political base that would include pro-choice voters.

On the day McCain announced her selection as his running mate, Palin thanked Clinton and Ferraro for blazing her trail. A day later, Ferraro noted her shock at Palin's comment. You see, none of her peers, no one, had ever publicly thanked her in the 24 years since her historic run for the White House. Ferraro has since refused to divulge for whom she's voting. Many more now are realizing that it does indeed take a woman - who happens to be a Republican named Sarah Palin.

Read the entire article. Ms. Bruce is an eloquent writer. And I believe she is correct. Gov. Palin, by virtue of being a self-made woman, is a "nuclear explosion" in the middle of the far left narrative. This stuff just gets more interesting by the day.


Dinah Lord said...

It's fascinating to watch the implosion...I pray it will continue.

For years I've been looking at the modern feminist movement and saying "WTH, I burned my bra for this shit?"

Then Gov Palin arrives on the scene and she looks like true, old school feminist. An honest to God traditional feminist with strong values.

Her entrance into the race revealed the old guard of the radical feminist movement as the true frauds they really are.


suek said...

This isn't exactly news...Tammy Bruce has been _out_ of the Democratic camp for some time now. It's true that she was pro-Hillary, but she pretty much split with the Dems on the same issue - NOW's treatment of women during the Clinton affairs issue. She was actually president of the local NOW group in LA, so it was a notable defection.
I think her radio show is on KRLA - the station being sued because it "supports the Republican Party" but has "a public air license".

I like her positions - she's very logical and straight thinking - but I have a problem listening to her. Her voice grates on my nerves.

WAKE UP said...

The upper-middle, university grad-feminist-journalist-but-don't-actually-get-a-real-job feminists were NEVER about equality for all (of any gender), but about their own narcissistic, self-obssessed lives. And they didn't KNOW anything.

Recommended reading " Sexual Suicide" by George Gilder (if you can find a copy).

Ymarsakar said...

Suek, that's what the internet is for ;)

So you don't have to listen to people, but can instead read. On words, all people are equal.

That was the power of the Gutenberg Printing Press.

Anonymous said...

I'll tell you what.
If every feminist out there doesn't vote for the McCain/Palin ticket, I NEVER want to hear them whine again about how mistreated they are! If they do, I'll shove them into traffic DNC-style.

Obama doesn't employ women in the inner circle of his campaign, and the secondary coffee-getters he does employ make less than the men doing the same damn job. McCain employs more women and he pays them more than the men!

So if you don't vote Palin, Gloria Steinem, STFU!